Using technology in the classroom is now the standard, but teachers and schools must decide which tools to use and how to implement them. Distinctive Schools‘ CICS West Belden is among the schools interviewed about technology in the classroom for a recent EdSurge article. In conjunction with LEAP Innovation, West Belden has been narrowing down tools for learning to find those that are most beneficial for instruction. Teachers are after tech that helps analyze data “at the speed of teaching” by immediately crunching data.
“Digital tools like the ones West Belden has put into place give students the ability to work at their own pace and progress as they learn key concepts, without teachers losing the ability to track their performance.”
Relationships between developers like those at LEAP Innovation, and teachers like those at CICS West Belden are being formed to select and craft software that works for teachers are students with a teacher’s first hand input driving decisions and development.
Keep up the good work West Belden!!!
The United States Armed Forces can offer an incomparable
opportunity for our country’s youth: paid college tuitions, specialised training, marketable skills, discipline and integrity. A course through the Armed Forces can turn into a lifelong career. This much acknowledged, do recruiters belong in the Public School System? Out of all of the developed countries in the world, the United States is the only one that permits this.
What began as presentations with an open invitation for students to visit recruiting offices, has evolved to a level that goes very much unadvertised by the Recruitment Departments. Section 9528 of the No Child Left Behind Act requires that schools give the military as much access to campuses and student contact info, as given to any other recruiter. Brian Lagotte, University of Kansas anthropologist has expressed concerns that school officials do not fully understand the policy and have granted unrestricted access of the campus to recruiting officers. He has found that a multitude of schools go so far as to allow military recruiters to coach sports, serve as substitute teachers and engage in extra circular activities.
Unsurprisingly, data released by the Army indicates that their recruitment activities in the State of Connecticut last year disproportionately targeted schools with high levels of low-income students. With all respect and admiration due for the armed forces, this does come across as predatory. And while it’s very much true that the military can offer a viable opportunity to escape the low-income generational cycle; should it be presented so overwhelmingly that it appears the only option? Should we be allowing recruiters to serve as substitute teachers? Or does this cross a line? I welcome you to share your opinions or experiences with this in the comment section below.
In the United States, we have indeed seen a tremendous improvement in high school graduation rates. Yet the numbers of high school dropouts still hover around half a million annually. In this brief article, the seven greatest threats to high school completion are explored, along with proposed solutions to each.
Nationwide, the dropout and unemployment rates of African American youth are significantly higher than white/Caucasian counterparts. These numbers are rooted in systemic issues widely acknowledged and agreed upon by educational and civic professionals. Looking forward as a society, we attempt to bridge that gap; ideally, there would be genuinely equal economic and educational opportunity, regardless of race. Some localities have wider gaps to solve than others:
Chicago may lead with the percentage of unemployed African American youth for big, American cities: according to this Chicago Tribune article. An estimated 41 percent (aged 20-24 years old) are jobless. These statistics indicate that there is nothing short of a crisis facing Chicago’s black community
Formative assessments are an invaluable tool utilized by educators to indicate educational growth and progress in students. Gust Elementary School in Denver has begun to utilize student self-assessment, with some indicators of success.
Students are given a rubric, or key indicator of what their work ‘should’ look like. With the guidance of their teacher, they make corrections as needed. The advocates behind self-assessment claim that students learn more by being given the opportunity to analyze their own work and make the necessary corrections. By involving students in the process, they are able to track their own educational growth. Ultimately, it has students becoming more invested in their education.
The faculty and students at Gust stand by their model. Students have embraced it and educators claim real progress. Self-assessment is popping up in schools and districts around the country. If you have had experience utilizing this model, please share your experiences in the comment section!
This enlightening article explores in detail how tech start ups hold the potential to revolutionize education. The traditional classroom environment comes with limitations; educators are usually stuck with a set curriculum that needs to be covered within a specific time-frame. Furthermore, the student-to-teacher ratio makes individualized learning nearly impossible. While teachers undoubtedly do their best to make sure every child understands the content, they cannot dedicate excess time while the rest of the class suffers. Similarly, students ahead of the curriculum cannot be given special time to cover more advanced concepts.
By utilizing digital mentoring, we can overcome these obstacles of traditional ed; and therefore offer a truly tailored experience for each child. Imagine if you will, a learning environment where curriculum was developed based upon each child’s current progress, strengths and weaknesses. And attention was given to them upon a one-to-one basis. While this does currently exist, it’s primarily in a testing stage. The results so far are promising: dramatically increased testing scores from the student participants.
Throughout the country there has been a gradual shift towards pushing for more AP (Advanced Placement) Courses; specifically, a push for higher enrollment within them. AP Courses are typically offered to high school students with no upfront cost to them (the school district pays about $90 per AP exam taken). Successful completion of an AP exam (usually a score of 3 out of 5, marking a passing rate) entitles a student to use that course towards college credit in most colleges and universities. One inherent benefit to the student who passes the exam is the reduced cost in college credit attainment. It has also been argued that students who don’t pass the exams still benefit from the exposure to the rigorous curriculum of these courses. From my experience in leading the push to greater access of more academic rigor for America’s students, I strongly support this notion.
There has been a call to question the motives of The College Board (the non-profit organization that offers AP exams); as we have seen this increase in course enrollment and availability correlated with decreased passing rates. Opponents often say that students are being pushed into taking courses that may be too advanced for them. They question if there is a profit-motive behind the increased enrollment, and assume that The College Board is to blame. The linked Chicago Tribune article here, explores this controversy.
If we are to return America to top-status academically, we must tap all ways to increase rigor, relevance, and results with our school kids. This reigns especially true for our under-served, under-exposed, and under-performing students.
I am deeply saddened to report that Dr. Phillip C. Schlechty, founder of Schlechty Center, passed away early yesterday morning. Like the thousands of educators he has influenced, I am left deeply saddened by this news. Phil was a leader in providing insightful education models for young minds.
Phil has done a masterful job of ensuring the continuity of leadership needed for this transition. Although our mentor and friend passed away yesterday; work at the Schlechty Center will continue to honor Phil’s legacy of creating engaging school’s for today’s students.
As we approach the end of the year, it is usually a time of reflection and dreaming for the future to come. I wanted to extend a warm holiday wish to all who follow my blog. May the time spent with family be merry and spirited. I sincerely hope that 2016 is a year filled with joy, prosperity and serenity for you!
Dr. Joseph Wise
In a simple, but powerful message; this blog post from EdWeek explores the power that educators have over young minds. It makes a good point, that teachers are human; and therefore, inherently imperfect. Mistakes are made, rough days are had, and on occasion an off-the-cuff comment towards a student may slip.
We’ve all been there, educators or not, that moment when we say something harsh or crude. The key to properly resolving such an outburst is the same in any work environment: a genuine apology, an acknowledgement that comments or actions made were in poor taste.
This proves particularly crucial with students. Regardless of outward appearances of students based on their attitudes; they generally look up to educators as role-models. And as much as a harsh comment can result in a lasting sting, the sign of humility and an ability to make amends for wrongs done will make for a much stronger lasting impression for the positive.